The Artist


2012-01-18

The Artist

Cinema, to an extent is always paying lip service to what came before.  Most recently, we’ve had Hugo – Martin Scorsese’s love letter to early cinema – particularly the visionary work of George Melies.  Similarly, Michel Hazanavicius’s film The Artist pays tribute to work of those before it – but conversely whilst Hugo was a film set in France made by an American director, The Artist is a film set in American made by a French director.


The Artist is set in the late 20s and early 30s, before Hollywoodland dropped the land and became plain old Hollywood.  It introduces us to George Valentin (Jean Dujardin), a silent movie star as we follow his friendship with a hopeful dancer, Peppy Miller (Bérénice Bejo).  As 1927 looms, it is the advent of the talkies.  In 1927, sound in cinema was thought to be a fad (in the same way that colour film and CGI were later).  Peppy becomes a star as George wonders if he will fade into silent obscurity.  In reality, this is exactly what happened, people thought sound would destroy the international language of cinema (although subtitles got us around it, in the same way that they did in the 20s) – and it quickly became something that we now take for granted.


Michel Hazanavicius has taken great care to ensure that The Artist feels authentic as possible – shooting in the 4:3 ratio, which was used at the time.  The film is photographed in black and white, and stylistically looks a lot like a film that could have been released in the late 1920s – using a lot shallow focus. 


There has been great attention paid to the world that The Artist is set in, when we are first taken into the world that it inhabits, we see the old Hollywoodland sign – the cars and costumes are all of the time, and the actors look every bit the part.


Both of the main actors – George Valentin and Peppy Miller do a remarkable job of resembling and behaving like silent film actors of the time – it’s very difficult not to smile whilst watching either of them do a comedic performance – and likewise, when the characters undergo hardship, you can’t help but feel for them.  It goes to show that you are in the hands of very talented actors, that they can give a performance better than most actors using dialogue.  The supporting cast are equally as good, and I couldn’t help but think that John Goodman’s cigar smoking film executive character, Al Zimmer, was somewhat inspired by the heavy smoking Miramax co-founder, Harvey Weinstein.  A special mention has to go to Uggie the dog, who has had audiences gushing superlatives to a point that there is a campaign to have the dog nominated for an Academy Award.


The Artist has been picking up steam since it was screened at Cannes in the summer, it was a strong audience favourite, but missed the Palm d’or, with Tree of Life picking it up instead (a film that divided audiences, I liked it, but The Artist is by far the better film).  However, now that it is on general release, the film seems to be garnering the attention and love that it deserves.  It has already picked up a few awards at the Golden Globes (which isn’t usually worth shouting about, but all the other award ceremonies that succeed it seem to vote based on the first one), and it must be a shoe-in to at least pick up at least a couple of awards at the BAFTAs and Oscars. 

Whether silent cinema is something that you are interested in or not, The Artist remains a must-see for everyone, unless you're from Liverpool.


Back to top



War Horse


2012-01-17

War Horse

War Horse is a film that many thought was impossible to make.  It was in development for around four years until Steven Spielberg took it under his wing.  The films is based on a 1982 children’s novel, which was later adapted in a hit west end play.


One thing that stands out in War Horse, is that it is about as far from Spielberg’s previous film – The Adventures of Tintin – as possible.  War Horse is a traditional film of the variety that John Ford would have made in the 40s or 50s – with very little in the way of visible CGI.  Spielberg has taken part in as many as ten productions set in or around the Second World War (directing six films, producing two more, and producing two TV series), but this is his first film set in the First World War.


The film starts in Devon, when Ted Narracot (Peter Mullan) buys a thoroughbred horse for his farm.  The horse is completely unsuited to working on a farm, but Ted’s son, Albert (Jeremy Irvine) takes a shine to it and gives it the name of Joey, and then goes on to train the horse.  The strangest thing about the film is that after the war is announced – we don’t really see much of the human characters from the first act until much later, which kind of undoes a lot of the groundwork laid in this act.  The main character is definitely the horse, and as Joey goes from person to person, we follow him (or one of the 14 horses playing him) around France.  Naturally, the film does have a lengthy sequence at the Somme, and it wouldn’t really be a film about World War I without showing the hellish conditions that the soldiers had to live in whilst in the trenches, frequently being sent to their deaths over tiny pieces of land.  The film may be based on a children’s book, but these sequences are quite upsetting, and it could be too much for younger children.  War Horse isn’t Saving Private Ryan, by any stretch of the imagination, but it still has strong “horrors of war” themes running right through it.


In the same way that Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy was a who’s who of British actors, War Horse does the same, but features actors from right across Europe.  There are strong (albeit brief) performances from the always fantastic Tom Hiddleston and Benedict Cumberbatch as two high ranking British soldiers.  Toby Kebbel has quite a moving performance as a South Shields soldier in the trenches, trying to cut a horse free in no mans land.  The surprise appearance for me was Nicholas Bro as a German horsemaster, who I had seen very recently in The Killing II.  However, none of the human cast really appear in the film for long, as Joey goes from person to person, it sort of feels like the film is nothing more than a collection of short stories set around the First World War, the link being that all of the people have met this horse.


Given that it’s a Spielberg film, the cinematography is second to none.  There’s some really distinct shots – such as the one when the British cavalry charge at machine guns and as we see the horses jump over the guns, no one is riding them anymore.  Completely unlike Tintin – the cinematography is mostly quite traditional, with the screen ratio being the old fashioned 2:35:1, which was 35mm anamorphic up until 1970.  There’s a great sunset at the end, which conjures memories of Gone with the Wind.


War Horse is a decent film, but a forgettable one.  Everything about it is pretty solid, although it feels somewhat strange that this horse keeps turning up everywhere.  It’s certainly a look back at older cinema, and nothing like the distinct visual style of Tintin, but hats off to Spielberg for creating something that manages to look a lot like the films that he was trying to recreate.


Back to top



Top 20 films of 2011


2012-01-08

Top 20 films of 2011

What a year it has been for film.  Here is my list of the very best films released in the UK in 2011.  There have been so many great films, which meant I had to leave off the likes of We Need to Talk About Kevin, Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, Beginners and 50/50.  We have been absolutely spoilt for choice this year, and here’s hoping that 2012 offers more of the same.  Without further ado, here is my top 20:


20.  The Skin I Live In


Pedro Almodóvar’s latest film follows Antonio Banderas as a plastic surgeon who is keeping a beautiful woman as a prisoner in his house.  As the film goes on, the mystery of this woman’s origins unravel, and whilst it is fairly predictable, it isn’t any less harrowing.  Banderas cuts a mean, menacing figure, whilst still remaining somewhat charming, and Almodóvar’s direction, and use of colour, is as always virtuosic.


19.  Warrior


It’s been a great year for Tom Hardy.  After last year’s Inception, and this year’s Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, he has shown that he has range.  Warrior is another film different for him – where he plays one of two estranged brothers fighting in an MMA competition.  There are easy comparisons to Rocky, The Wrestler, and The Fighter, but this isn’t necessarily a bad thing.  Those films had a lot of heart, and so does this one.


18.  Black Swan


Black Swan was loved by everyone when it came out, but seems to have garnered some criticism towards the end of the year – there’s no pleasing some people is there?!  Natalie Portman (who was practically ubiquitous this year), gives the performance of her life, along with Vincent Cassell and Mila Kunis.  This makes a great companion piece to one of Aronofsky’s other films, The Wrestler.  Just don’t eat before you see it.


17.  Senna


The strongest documentaries tend to have universal appeal, regardless of their subject.  Take Senna, a film that so well crafted that even people who have no interest in Formula One enjoyed it.  I long ago gave up on the sport, but can still remember seeing the crash that claimed Senna’s life.  A very emotional film, that tells the story using footage and interviews – this story has no need for a voiceover.


16.  Super 8


It has been quite the year for alien/invasion films.  Super 8 is the story of a group of teenagers in 1979 making a low budget super 8 (the 8mm film camera format) film, when a train derails and releases something strange into the town.  It’s a very nostalgic film – nostalgic more for a type of film than for a time.  Super 8 is reminiscent of the work that the likes of Steven Spielberg created in the late 70s and early 80s.  Make sure that you stay for the credits and see the film that the kids created.


15.  The King's Speech


A period piece about British monarchy usually isn’t my idea of fun at all, but The King’s Speech was a story that warmed everyone, even me.  This is because it’s a film less interested in the politics of the Royal Family, and centres around a man who never wanted to be king due to his stammer.  The performances of the always fantastic Colin Firth, as well as Geoffrey Rush go a long way in the film, but Tom Hooper deserves praise for making an underdog story from the Royal Family’s illustrious past.


14.  Submarine


Richard Ayoade’s  directorial debut is a coming of age story set in rural Wales.  The story has more in common with Rushmore than anything else, but the protagonist’s creepy tendencies also reminded me of Hallam Foe.  Strong performances from both the younger members of the cast as well as the older ones, partnered with a folky sounding score from Alex Turner and some unusual cinematography make this a film well worth watching.


13.  Attack the Block


Being a fan of Adam and Joe for such a long time, I was pretty excited about Joe Cornish’s debut about some aliens attacking a tower block in London.  The aliens unfortunately picked the wrong tower block and get involved in a fight with some local yoofs.  I spent a lot of the film not really understanding any of the dialogue, but I guess I have same disadvantage as anyone else outside of London.  Despite this, the film overcomes this by having such talented young actors that you initially dislike but become quite attached to by the end of the film.


12.  Rango


A year where the best animated film released wasn’t a Pixar one, what’s going on!?  Rango is a very heavily western influenced animated film, starring Johnny Depp as the eponymous Rango.  The characters are absolutely brilliant, and the use of lots of Western genre mechanics like the no-name character, and the old west versus modernisation work really well.  There are a few nods to Chinatown, the Dollars Trilogy and even Fear and Loathing in Last Vegas, which makes it a film that is as enjoyable for adults as it is for children.


11.  Thor


I hadn’t really expected much from a film about one of my least favourite Marvel heroes, directed by Kenneth Branagh (and I have nothing against Branagh, it just seemed like such an odd choice at the time).  However, I was pleasantly surprised with how well Thor worked.  The ‘fish out of water’ scenes of Thor on Earth were especially good.  I regretted seeing it in 3D, as it was retrofitted, but I won’t make that mistake again.  See it in 2D to make the most of it.


10.  13 Assassins


I don’t usually like to throw about terms like “masterpiece” unless I’m giving it to a film that really deserves it.  13 Assassins is one such film.  Takashi Miike provides a samurai film that can stand tall with the greats of the genre.  Essential viewing for samurai/western/world cinema fans.


9.  Bridesmaids


I’m usually happiest at the cinema when I’m watching something that Judd Apatow’s name is attached to.  Bridesmaids is no exception.  Some called it “The Hangover for girls”, and to label it as this is not only lazy, but doesn’t do the film justice – as it is not only superior, but the only thing they have in common is that both films have people in them.  An incredibly funny film.  Just prepare yourself to constantly have to justify liking it to male friends.


8.  Melancholia


Lars Von Trier isn’t known for his light hearted romantic comedies, so no-one should be surprised that this is a miserable film about a planet on a collision course with Earth.  What is surprising is how uplifting and touching it turns out to be.  Had this film been made in Hollywood, Bruce Willis would come and save us, but it wasn’t, so everyone dies.


7.  The Guard


The Guard is a buddy cop film set in rural Republic of Ireland – Brendan Gleeson plays an unorthodox Garda who is teamed up with a straight to the point FBI agent, whilst they try to uncover a drug smuggling operation.  What follows is a film that is as hilarious as it is violent. 


6.  Hugo


Martin Scorsese’s decision to make a children’s film in 3D seemed like an odd one when it was first announced, but upon watching it, it all seems to right.  Outside of Pixar, it’s the only time that my enjoyment of a film has been amplified by it being in 3D.  Scorsese’s love letter to early cinema makes it a must see for cineastes of any age.


5.  Troll Hunter


Found footage films aren’t anything new, but this has to be the first time one has ever been made about a group of Norwegian students following some hunters looking for mythical trolls.  For a film with such a tiny budget, the special effects really are impressive, and the film looks like it would have cost a lot more than what it did.  The film is both funny and affecting, and I can also thank the film for introducing me to the brutal Norwegian band, Kvelertak in the closing credits.  As is often the case with foreign language films, the rights for a remake have already been snapped up by an American company (rather insultingly announced on the day of the film’s release in the United States).  The thought of this working outside of Scandinavia is laughable, and for me the original Troll Hunter will always be the true one.


        4.  The Fighter


The Fighter had a long, troubled, turbulent creation, but that’s what you come to expect with David O Russell at the helm.  Much more Raging Bull than Rocky, The Fighter is based on the true story of Micky Ward, and again, most of the fighting happens outside of the ring.  However, the boxing itself is excellently choreographed, and the decision to use cameras that would have been used in the mid-90s (when the film is based) gives it a very distinct look.  Mark Wahlberg’s performance as Micky Ward is a joy to behold, but the real star of the show is Christian Bale, playing his crack-addled brother.  Bale deservedly picked up an Oscar for his performance, and watching the ending credit when you see the real Dicky Eklund, it’s terrifying how accurate Bale’s performance is.


        3.  True Grit


It would take a Coen brothers film to be released right at the start of the year, but remain so memorable that it still is one that springs to mind instantly when talking about best films to come out this year.  Whilst there has been the occasional attempt to make a traditional western lately (Meek’s Cutoff being a particularly decent effort), none of them nail the atmosphere and spirit of the films created by the likes of Ford and Leone in the 50s and 60s.  More an adaptation of the Charles Portis book, than a remake of John Wayne’s 1969 film, True Grit is a very special film, and easily holds up to the multiple viewings that it has received from me.


        2.  Midnight in Paris

I’ll be honest.  As a long time Woody Allen fan, I had begun to write him off.  Even the films that the critics like – such as the godawful Vicky Cristina Barcelona left me cold.  However, there were glimmers of hope with last year’s not terrible You Will Meet a Tall Dark Stranger.  Midnight in Paris is a very strong film, featuring all of his hallmarks.  This time, Owen Wilson plays the Woody Allen character, a disillusioned writer on holiday in Paris, who drunkenly finds a car that takes him into 1920s Paris – where he meets literary heroes like F. Scott Fitzgerald, Ernest Hemingway, and Gertrude Stein to name a few.  Granted, there are times when it feels a little like a very highbrow Goodnight Sweetheart, but these moments are fleeting and what we are given is not only one of Woody’s best films in decades but one of his very best.


       1.  Drive

Drive was a rare film for me.  During the build up to it’s release, where I saw the trailer every time I visited the cinema (which is pretty often), I would get more and more excited about seeing it, rather than increasingly fed up with seeing the same trailer.  When I finally got to see it, I immediately wanted to watch it again.  It’s a hard film to pin down – there are neo-noir influences, neo-western influence (particularly the no-name protagonist with a mysterious past), and also quite a strong 80s influence, particularly in the synth-pop soundtrack, the costumes, and the neon pink font across the opening credits – which brought memories of Scarface.  All in all, it is a powerful, brooding, and often extremely violent film.  With strong performances all around (although admittedly I found Carey Mulligan’s performance to be a little ordinary), and very distinct cinematography, it is undoubtedly my film of the year.


Stinker of the year: Hobo with a Shotgun

 

Wasn’t Grindhouse revival a little 2007?  In this turd of a film, Rutger Hauer plays a hobo with a shotgun.  However, he’s barely in it, and instead we have to watch some poorly scripted and poorly acted villains torture innocent people and set children on fire.  The humour is crap and the violent just feels cruel rather than funny.  This was Jason Eisener’s first film.  I can’t help but feel that his time would have been better spent if he’d tried to make a decent film first rather than intentionally making a bad one.


Top 5 performances:


5.  Adrien Brody - Midnight in Paris

4.  Kirsten Dunst - Melancholia

3.  Christian Bale - The Fighter

2.  Ryan Gosling - Drive

1.  Tom Hardy - Warrior





Back to top



The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo


2012-01-05

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo

It was always going to be the case that The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo would be remade in English.  It’s an international bestselling novel, which shot its author, Steig Larsson into the limelight posthumously, and was then made into a very well received Swedish film.  The book and film are part of a trilogy, and we all know how much Hollywood loves franchises – not to mention franchises based on bestselling novels.

 

The thing with adapting foreign films into the English language is that a lot is often lost in the translation – The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo escapes relatively unscathed from this – given it’s fairly nearby setting of Sweden – and being from Northern Scotland I can certainly empathise with the long, dark, cold winters that we have in common.  The other thing about adapting foreign films into English is that they are almost exclusively terrible – obviously there are a few exceptions to this rule – but the majority of the time, when films are rewritten in English, with famous actors, this is simply because Hollywood is of the opinion that English speaking audiences can’t be bothered to watch a film with subtitles.  If this is the case, then we are in trouble – we’re now at a tipping point where the English language version is announced around the same time as the foreign language one is released in the US (in the case of Troll Hunter, on the same day) – and if audiences really are at a point where they’d rather wait for a version lacking the charm of the original, just because they don’t want to read subtitles, then I pray for us all.

 

I must say that I read all of The Girl… books and saw all of the original Swedish films, and particularly loved the first one – in short, I am definitely not Paramount’s target audience.  However, given that a director as strong as David Fincher was attached to film, I felt like I ought to see if the remake could hold up to it’s predecessor. 

Firstly, I know that the film was being touted as a ‘readaptation’ rather than a ‘remake’ – but frankly, I’m not buying it.  The films are very similar, too similar at times – and there are times when it feels that it was very cheeky to redo this film in English, when the original was out in cinemas not two years ago.

However, one thing that the film does have over the original is style.  Fincher has directed two of my favourite thrillers of the last twenty years in Se7en, and Zodiac, and I didn’t doubt that he would do half a job on The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo.  The cinematography is excellent, and Fincher’s usual fast paced, choppy style, honed during his past life directing music videos is always apparent here.  However, there is a very odd title sequence at the beginning of the film, which feels like something out of a Trent Reznor scored James Bond film.  It’s a very out of place sequence – particularly when you take into account the slow pacing of the film.

 

There has been a very strong critical response to Rooney Mara’s portrayal of the troubled hacker, Lisbeth Salander, and she is definitely a reason to see the film.  Mara gets Lisbeth near enough spot on (aside from a few scenes, but these are more the fault of the script then the actress), but it does feel a lot like she’s seen Noomi Rapace’s performance of the same character and done effectively the same thing.  There are changes to her character, however, that feel pretty unnecessary – there’s a scene when she screams “I am insane!” into an attackers face.  This is not like the Lisbeth portrayed in either the book or the film – as she would never admit to being insane.  It undermines a huge theme of the story as well – a young girl betrayed by the men in her life and failed by the state, and for her to label herself insane, sort of ruins what is to come later in the story. 

Rooney Mara does get the Swedish accent spot on, and aside from Christopher Plummer and the native Swedish actors, I can’t say the same for the rest of the cast.  Daniel Craig’s accent is particularly poor, to a point where a friend of mine thought that his character was supposed to be English – and a lot of the other North American actors seem to be doing more of an English accent than a Scandinavian one.

Dodgy accent aside, Daniel Craig’s performance as the disgraced journalist Mikael Blomkvist is fine.  Daniel Craig frequently plays the same character, and here is no exception.  It’s…fine.

The supporting job do a fine job too, but strong performances from Christopher Plummer as Henrik Vanger and Stellan Skarsgård as his son, Martin Vanger, are highlights.

 

The biggest letdown of the film is Steven Zaillian’s script – which is very weak in places.  The weakest link in the script is the reliance on making characters say how they feel, rather than just showing the audience.  This is particularly visible when some of the dialogue is as bad as it is.  Also, Apple fans will be glad to hear that none of the Mac porn, that surrounded both the book and original film, has been omitted.

 

If I had to review The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo in three words, I would say “it was okay”.  The only thing that it has over the original is that it is visually stunning.  Aside from that, it’s too similar to the original to warrant making another film based on the same source material.  Had there been ten years between making the Swedish version and the American version, I wouldn’t have minded at all, but it almost feels like Hollywood is saying “Foreign language films – bad, English language films – good”. 

 

During that odd title sequence, there’s a cover of Led Zeppelin’s “immigrant song” by Trent Reznor and Karen O playing over the top.  This film feels a bit like that cover – it’s a good version of someone else’s song – but it’s still someone else’s song.

 


Back to top



Archives







Back to top

About


I’ve always loved film. I remember seeing Robocop, Terminator and Aliens in the early 90s when I was far too young to be watching them, and it began a love affair that has lasted over twenty years. I’ve always loved writing too, so to combine the two of them was a no brainer.

I used to write about music, particularly for my university paper and on other blogs, but I found most of the other people who wanted to write about music to have more of an interest in being seen as “cool”, and the bands seemed to think that they were doing me a favour when I offered to photograph them. I still love music, but music journalism certainly is not for me. I’ll just stick to playing it.

Writing about film feels a lot more organic, I don’t have to worry about hurting anyone’s feelings, and as I graduated in Film and Media a couple of years ago, I am hoping that a prospective employer may gain insight into my writing style.

I divide my writing time mostly between here and Den of Geek, where I write more about TV shows and video games than films. I currently have several film projects of my own in the works which I hope to complete this year. When I am not writing about/thinking about/making films, I play bass in The Stay Gones.

Contact